Pluribus AI 2026 Election

2026 Midterms · U.S. House · Idaho Safe

Idaho — 2nd District

Portrait of Elinor Gilbreath

Democratic

Elinor Gilbreath

Portrait of Michael K. Simpson

Republican

Michael K. Simpson

Incumbent

The general election for Idaho's 2nd Congressional District features long-serving Republican incumbent Michael K. Simpson against Democratic challenger Elinor Gilbreath. Simpson, who has represented the district since 1999, emphasizes his conservative record on border security, agriculture, energy production, and Second Amendment rights. Gilbreath, an attorney and mediator, bases her campaign on constitutional accountability, protecting public lands, lowering living costs, and government ethics reform. Major election analysts including Cook Political Report, DDHQ/The Hill, Inside Elections, and Sabato's Crystal Ball rate the race as Solid or Safe Republican.

01

Economy and cost of living

high salience

Gilbreath advocates targeting corporate price gouging, Wall Street housing speculation, and tax inequality, while Simpson focuses on federal spending cuts and a constitutional balanced budget amendment.

Elinor Gilbreath

Supports fighting price gouging and housing speculation

Gilbreath focuses on lowering living costs by tackling corporate price gouging, stopping Wall Street institutional investors from purchasing Idaho housing, and reforming taxes. She seeks to ease financial burdens for working families while supporting local entrepreneurs.

  • Fight price gouging on food and essential goods
  • Ban Wall Street firms from purchasing single-family homes in Idaho
  • Implement tax fairness so working families pay proportionally less than the ultra-wealthy

“The biggest divide in America is not left vs. right. It’s top vs. bottom.”

“Stop Wall Street from buying up Idaho homes and driving up costs.”

Michael K. Simpson

Supports federal spending cuts and balanced budget

Simpson emphasizes controlling federal spending and reducing national debt as the core approach to national economic stability. He supports a constitutional amendment to balance the federal budget and voted for spending reduction reconciliation measures.

  • Co-sponsored H.J. Res. 1 to mandate a balanced federal budget
  • Voted for the H.R. 1 One Big Beautiful Bill Act reconciliation bill
  • Voted for the Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023

“...getting our fiscal house in order must be the first priority of a Congress.”

02

Government integrity and election administration

medium salience

Gilbreath emphasizes banning congressional stock trading and dark money in politics, whereas Simpson focuses on implementing mandatory photo ID and proof-of-citizenship requirements for voters.

Elinor Gilbreath

Supports ethics reform and banning dark money

Gilbreath champions ethics reforms to restore public trust in Congress, including banning stock trading by lawmakers and their immediate families. She calls for ending dark money campaign funding and strengthening checks and balances between government branches.

  • Ban congressional stock trading for members and immediate families
  • Prohibit dark money and increase campaign finance transparency
  • Strengthen constitutional checks and balances across government branches

“End congressional stock trading for members and their immediate families.”

“Ban dark money and increase campaign finance transparency.”

Michael K. Simpson

Supports mandatory voter photo ID requirements

Simpson supports strict election security measures to prevent voter fraud, focusing on mandatory photo identification for all voters. He voted in favor of federal legislation requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote.

  • Require photo ID for all in-person and absentee voters
  • Voted for the SAVE Act (H.R. 22) requiring documentary proof of citizenship for voting

“Mike Simpson knows that the only way to protect our elections from fraud and illegal votes is to uphold the constitution and require a real, photo ID for anyone who wants to vote.”

03

Abortion and reproductive rights

medium salience

Gilbreath frames reproductive choice as a fundamental right to personal healthcare privacy, whereas Simpson maintains a strict pro-life position allowing exceptions only for rape, incest, or maternal life.

Elinor Gilbreath

Supports healthcare privacy and reproductive freedom

Gilbreath defends reproductive freedom as a matter of personal privacy and healthcare choice free from government interference. She advocates for protecting maternal health services and family care access.

  • Protect the right to privacy in personal healthcare decisions
  • Strengthen maternal health and family healthcare services

“The right to privacy — including the right to make your own healthcare decisions.”

Michael K. Simpson

Opposes abortion with limited exceptions

Simpson holds a pro-life stance and consistently votes to restrict federal funding for abortion services. He supports abortion bans with exceptions for rape, incest, and protecting the mother's life.

  • Maintains a 100% pro-life voting record
  • Opposes taxpayer funding for abortion procedures
  • Supports abortion exceptions strictly for rape, incest, or life of the mother

“I am pro-life and committed to protecting the unborn.”

04

Public lands, environment, and energy

medium salience

Gilbreath focuses on keeping public lands public and promoting clean energy, while Simpson opposes climate regulations like the Green New Deal in favor of traditional energy baseloads.

Elinor Gilbreath

Supports public land preservation and clean energy

Gilbreath advocates for keeping federal public lands in public hands, opposing any transfer or sale to private interests. She calls for protecting Idaho's water rights, improving forest management, and developing responsible energy sources.

  • Oppose the sale or transfer of public lands to private or political interests
  • Protect Idaho water rights and improve forest management/wildfire prevention
  • Ensure responsible energy development balancing federal and state authority

“Keep public lands public. Oppose the sale or transfer of public lands to private or political interests.”

Michael K. Simpson

Supports traditional energy and opposes Green New Deal

Simpson strongly opposes sweeping environmental legislation like the Green New Deal, characterizing it as government overreach. He champions an all-of-the-above energy strategy that preserves traditional power sources such as coal, nuclear, hydro, and natural gas.

  • Oppose Green New Deal climate legislation
  • Voted for the Lower Energy Costs Act (H.R. 1)
  • Support all-of-the-above energy development including fossil fuels and nuclear power

“While I share the concerns of many Americans about climate change, I am also concerned about the overreaching and ambiguous nature of the Green New Deal.”

05

Gun rights and Second Amendment

medium salience

Gilbreath includes the Second Amendment among equal constitutional freedoms requiring non-partisan enforcement, whereas Simpson opposes federal gun restrictions and holds an NRA endorsement.

Elinor Gilbreath

Supports Second Amendment and constitutional rights

Gilbreath lists the Second Amendment alongside speech, religion, and privacy as fundamental freedoms that belong to all Americans. She advocates applying constitutional rights evenly without political weaponization.

  • Protect Second Amendment rights as part of equal constitutional application
  • Ensure firearm laws are applied lawfully without political weaponization

“The Second Amendment.”

“Rights must be applied evenly and lawfully — without favoritism, political weaponization, or selective enforcement.”

Michael K. Simpson

Opposes federal restrictions on gun ownership

Simpson believes the Second Amendment strictly prohibits the federal government from restricting gun ownership rights for citizens. He actively opposes new federal firearm regulations and holds an endorsement from the National Rifle Association.

  • Oppose federal restrictions on gun ownership
  • Endorsed by the National Rifle Association (NRA)

“I firmly believe this provision prohibits the federal government from denying citizens this right.”

06

Agriculture

medium salience

Simpson highlights his caucus leadership for specific agricultural commodities, while Gilbreath emphasizes the general economic importance of farming and water rights.

Elinor Gilbreath

Supports farm stability and water rights

Gilbreath views agriculture and water rights as foundational to Idaho's economy and heritage. She calls for practical, evidence-based support for local farms and rural working communities.

  • Protect Idaho water rights for local agricultural use
  • Support small businesses and farming communities

“Farmers don’t rely on theory. They test what works.”

Michael K. Simpson

Supports commodity protections and trade promotion

Simpson considers agricultural promotion a main focus of his congressional service. He serves in key commodity caucuses to champion policies that assist Idaho's potato, sugar, and dairy producers.

  • Member of the House Potato Caucus, House Sugar Caucus, and Congressional Dairy Caucus
  • Promote and protect agricultural trade and efficiency for Idaho producers

“During my time in Congress, I have made the promotion of Idaho agriculture one of my top priorities.”

07

Border security and immigration

high salience

Simpson prioritizes physical border wall construction and stricter federal enforcement, whereas Gilbreath does not outline a specific immigration platform on her official materials.

Elinor Gilbreath No documented position in our sources

Michael K. Simpson

Supports border wall and stricter enforcement

Simpson identifies border security as the nation's most urgent priority and advocates for constructing a southern border wall. He supports hiring additional Border Patrol agents and reversing Biden administration immigration policies.

  • Build the southern border wall
  • Increase the number of Border Patrol agents
  • Voted for the Laken Riley Act (S. 5) and the DUI deportation bill (H.R. 875)

“Securing the border and stopping illegal immigration is the most important issue facing our nation today”

“I am fighting to build the wall, add more border patrol agents, and stop Biden’s…”

08

Healthcare access and costs

low salience

Gilbreath proposes rural healthcare expansion and drug pricing transparency, whereas Simpson lacks a detailed healthcare platform in source materials.

Elinor Gilbreath

Supports rural healthcare expansion and drug transparency

Gilbreath focuses on making healthcare and prescription drugs affordable for Idaho families. She advocates for strengthening rural healthcare networks and increasing transparency in pharmaceutical pricing.

  • Strengthen rural healthcare systems and increase medical provider access
  • Improve transparency in prescription drug pricing
  • Protect maternal health services

“Strengthen rural healthcare systems and increase provider access.”

“Improve transparency in drug pricing.”

Michael K. Simpson No documented position in our sources
09

Veterans affairs

low salience

Simpson advocates full federal funding for the Veterans Administration based on his committee experience, whereas Gilbreath does not present a specific veterans platform in source materials.

Elinor Gilbreath No documented position in our sources

Michael K. Simpson

Supports fully funding the Veterans Administration

Simpson emphasizes meeting federal obligations to military veterans by fully funding the Veterans Administration. He utilizes his seat on the House Appropriations Committee to ensure resources reach veteran programs.

  • Support full funding for Veterans Administration operations
  • Utilize Appropriations Committee position to protect veterans' benefits

“As a former member of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs and current member of the House Appropriations Committee, I am committed to making sure our nation fulfills its obligations to our nation’s veterans and fully funds the operations of the Veterans Administration.”